Ones+benefits+equal+to+another+suffering

1. REvise your thesis. It should not "answer" a question. It should be a statement of your argument or main premise. 2. 3rd person point of view. 3. Don't forget the introduction must end iwth your thesis. 4. All details must have parenthetical citations before you can begin to write your essay. 5. Fix these things and you are good to go.‍

Name: Rachel Fowler

‍‍‍‍‍Topic: Is human benefit worth the pain and suffering animals recive from testing medicine/cosmetics made for us?
==‍‍‍‍‍Thesis Statement: Man was made to be equal, not with the right to be selfish or harm anyone or thing.==

‍‍‍‍‍Outline:
I. As the world continues to evolve so does our standards, we have changed our out looks on topics, values, and respect to fit into where modern society stands today. Go back in time a couple decades ago and you will see that times have most definitlly changed. Although some people may think that they are a good egg but they are rotten until they stand up and argue for what is right. Many people just sit at home put on their makeup or take their pills without even a thought crossing their mind for how they got those things. Not only may they not be thankful for those things they are not thankful for where they come from. More then 100 million animals every year suffer and and die in cruel chemical, drug, food, cosmetic tests, biology lessons, medical training, and curiosity-driven experiments. Man was made to be equal, not with the right to be selfish or harm anyone oe thing. II. Body Paragraph #1 -. The tests we run are not even always accurate 90% of the tests we run in mice are not effective in humans ( Panno) Reducing the number drugs that won't be sucessful could eliminate hundreds of millions of dollars ( Jacobson) We should have products that have the same effects on us not the effect products have on animals such as mice (Joesph)

III.Body Paragraph #2 - We could use our knowledge to create testing more effective that doesn't include animals If we had to use humans or another resource then we would be forced to use less harmful products ( Jacobson) New models would save 100 million animals every year, therefore save 1000 million in 10 years ( Panno) Creating testing that is non-aminal would allow us not only to expand our knowledge but it would benefit us to have testing that could help us figure out things we hadn't before. (Joesph)

Body Paragraph #3 - Animal testing supporters have stopped sticking up for what they believe in. Supporters have dropped from 70 to 54% in 2008 ( Spencer) If the supporters stop then government will forget about it, we must take action (Spencer) 100 million animals will be stuck in cages bored starving and never having a chance to experience normal life (Panno)

V. Conclusion - Animal testing is cruel and unusual. The consisttution clearly states in the 8th amendment that there shall not be cruel/unusual punishment.

Rough Draft:

As the world continues to evolve so does humans ethical standards; people have changed their views on topics such as vaules to fit into the idea that modern society has of what people should be. If someone came from back in time they would be astonished of how people look,dress,and behave. Although some people may think that they are a good egg, they are rotten until they stand up and argue for what is right. Many people just sit at home put on their makeup or take their pills without even a thought crossing their mind for how they got those things. Not only may they not be thankful for those things they are not thankful for where they come from. More then 100 million animals every year suffer and and die in cruel chemical, drug, food, cosmetic tests, biology lessons, medical training, and curiosity-driven experiments. Man was made to be equal, not with the right to be selfish or harm anyone or thing.

Animal testing is very unnecessary, one fact being the tests we run, that cause so much pain are not even always accurate. "90% of the tests we run in mice are not effective in human beings"( Panno). This mean that 10% of the testing we perform on mice is necessary. People put animals stuffed into cages bored and half alive from the damages of testing and this is normal to people? "Reducing the number of drugs that won't be sucessful could eliminate hundreds of millions of dollars" ( Jacobson). If humans reduce the number of drugs that won't be sucessful will put millions of dollars back into Americans pockets. The United States is in serious debt and they cannot afford wasting so much money on something that is doing nothing but killing innocent animals. "We should have products that have the same effects on us not the effect products have on animals such as mice" (Joesph).

The testing someone performs on a mice will not have the same effect of a human. That means everything put into testing a mouse such as the money, time, medicines could have been saved for something that would actually benefit people. "Creating testing that is non-aminal would allow us not only to expand our knowledge but it would benefit us to have testing that could help us figure out things we hadn't before" (Joesph). Some humans are smart but they could become a lot smarter buy having to figure out things that they don't know. They would have to problem solve to create differnt testing, trying different things could bring different results. These results could be something like curing cancer.

Animal testing supporters have stopped sticking up for what they believe in."Supporters have dropped from 70 to 54% in 2008"( Spencer). People have backed down from government to fall under the crowd. Some people may be embarrssed to speak their thoughts and many animals will suffer in the process." If the supporters stop then government will forget about it, we must take action" (Spencer). The govermnet is powerful and mighty but is also based somewhat on popular sovernty. If the people don't speak what they think they will never be heard, the activists may stop being so active with speaking their opininon."100 million animals will be stuck in cages bored starving and never having a chance to experience normal life" (Panno). When humans think of animals they usually think of pets that live happily with families. In the real world 100 million animals will be pressed up in cages awaiting cruel testing and death. They will never have a chance to feel happy or a sense of belonging. They will just be a forgoten about animal dead in the scinence labortory.

Animal testing is torture, and definitly cruel and unusual. The consituiton our country lives by states in the 8th amendment that no American shall endure cruel and unusual punishment. It is evident that animal testing can cause fatal harm that is not even completly nesscessay. Humans must act upon this time of crisis and start to even process that kind of torture that occurs in labs. The benefit of even the high and mighty is not civil nor is it worth the death of 100 miliion animals. If people continue to stroll around the earth without taking action they will feel the wrath of guilt as our animal population slowly decends. People can turn from a rotten egg to a golden egg just by a sense of awareness. Human benefit is not worth causing suffering to an animal.